The Supreme Court recently took suo motu cognisance of Justice Srishananda's comments and sought report from Karnataka HC registrar

Bengaluru: Justice V Srishananda of the Karnataka High Court has expressed regret over the alleged objectionable remarks he made recently during judicial proceedings, which have gone

Karnataka HC's Justice V Srishananda expressed regret for his controversial remarks referring to a Bengaluru locality as

Justice V. Srishananda had termed a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" during the court proceedings

Justice V Srishananda of the Karnataka High Court has expressed regret over the alleged objectionable remarks he made recently during judicial proceedings, which have gone viral prompting the Supreme Court to take cognisance of it.

The judge's rebuke of a female advocate & comments calling an area in Bangalore 'Pakistan' have gone viral on social media. The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the matter.

Supreme Court on Friday took a dim view of Karnataka HC judge V Srishananda's purported gratuitous reference to a Muslim-majority Bengaluru.

Judges should speak only about the subject matter they are hearing, said former Lokayukta and Supreme Court judge Santosh Hegde

The Supreme Court has sought a report from the Karnataka High Court regarding controversial remarks made by Justice Srishananda, after prominent advocates like Indira Jaising had called for suo moto cognisance of the incident.

The judge, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as 'Pakistan'

Justice Srishananda made the controversial remarks while addressing landlord-tenant dispute. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, in a video on her X account, posted that the judge should be trained on gender sensitisation.